Green hydrogen India: export dream, industrial reality

Date:

Green hydrogen could become a serious Indian industry. But the near-term story is not household fuel or miracle exports. It is fertiliser, refineries, steel, ports, and hard cost arithmetic.

At first glance, green hydrogen looks like the sort of idea governments love and markets overprice: a clean molecule, a giant future market, and a long list of memorandums that arrive years before meaningful volumes do. Yet dismissing it as hype misses what is actually happening. India isn’t building a green-hydrogen economy to replace petrol pumps or household LPG. It is trying to solve a more strategic problem: how to decarbonise the hard end of the industrial economy while cutting import dependence in sectors like fertilizers and refining. That’s why the real question isn’t whether green hydrogen is fashionable. It is whether it can become cheap enough, reliable enough and large enough to matter where electrons alone can’t do the job.

The first reality check is about use-cases. Global hydrogen demand rose to almost 100 million tonnes in 2024, but demand from new applications was still less than 1% of the total, according to the IEA. In other words, hydrogen today remains overwhelmingly an industrial feedstock, not a mass-market transport fuel. That matters for India. The near-term winners here are not passenger cars or general power generation. They are ammonia production, petroleum refining, select chemicals, and eventually green steel and shipping-linked fuels. This is why the Indian policy architecture is increasingly pointed toward green ammonia for fertilizers and hydrogen supply for refineries, where buyers already exist, molecules are already consumed, and the decarbonisation math is easier to defend.

That industrial focus is visible in the National Green Hydrogen Mission itself. The government’s stated 2030 ambition remains at least 5 million metric tonnes of green hydrogen production annually, backed by about 125 GW of associated renewable-energy capacity. The mission’s broader framing is expansive: large investment mobilisation, job creation, lower fossil-fuel imports and export potential in hydrogen derivatives. But what makes the policy more credible than the early headline suggests is that it is no longer only a target document. By March 2026, India had commissioned around 8,000 tonnes per annum of green hydrogen capacity, which is still tiny against the 2030 aspiration, but it is no longer theoretical. Early capacity is beginning to move from policy slide to operating asset.

The real bottleneck, though, is cost. India disclosed in March 2026 that discovered green hydrogen prices under competitive bidding were ₹397 per kg for supply to Indian Oil’s refinery and ₹387 per kg for supply to BPCL and HPCL refineries, inclusive of GST. That is progress, but it is not cheap fuel. It explains why green hydrogen is still a boardroom product rather than a commodity that can sweep through the economy on its own. The same official disclosure noted that renewable electricity contributes roughly 50% to 70% of total green hydrogen production cost, around ₹235 per kg. That single line explains almost the whole business model. If cheap round-the-clock renewable power doesn’t materialise, green hydrogen won’t become transformative. The molecule is only as competitive as the power system, financing structure and utilisation rate sitting underneath it.

Electrolysers are the second cost story. The IEA says installed electrolyser CAPEX is currently around USD 2,000/kWe for alkaline systems and USD 2,450/kWe for PEM systems, though Chinese alkaline systems can be far lower. That gap is why India’s mission isn’t just subsidising production; it is also trying to build domestic manufacturing. The SIGHT programme already shows 1.5 GW of awarded electrolyser manufacturing capacity in Tranche I and another 1.5 GW in Tranche II on the mission portal. On the hydrogen-production side, the portal lists 412,000 tonnes per annum awarded in Mode-1 Tranche I and 450,000 tonnes per annum in Mode-1 Tranche II. This matters because green hydrogen economics don’t improve only when power gets cheaper. They improve when equipment scales, domestic supply chains deepen, factories learn, and financing costs fall. In that sense, hydrogen may yet resemble solar more than IT: less a software export miracle, more a long manufacturing and infrastructure grind with eventual cost compression.

The most commercially mature Indian demand story today is fertilizers. On March 31, 2026, the government facilitated the exchange of 11 green ammonia agreements for the fertilizer sector. The mission portal lists a total annual green-ammonia requirement of 724,000 tonnes across fertilizer buyers, with discovered prices ranging from ₹49.75 per kg to ₹64.74 per kg depending on project and location. That development is more significant than it may look. India’s fertilizer system still depends materially on imported ammonia, and the government explicitly linked these long-term agreements to price stability, supply reliability and lower import dependence. For the Indian middle class, that sounds distant. It isn’t. Fertilizer volatility feeds food inflation, subsidy pressure and fiscal stress. If green ammonia can stabilise part of that chain over time, the payoff is not just lower emissions; it is lower vulnerability in a politically sensitive market.

Exports are the other big promise, but they need restraint. India’s official mission document has long spoken of a potential export opportunity of around 10 MMT of green hydrogen or green ammonia per year, aiming at roughly 10% of the global market. More recently, three major ports, Deendayal, V.O. Chidambaranar and Paradip, were recognised as Green Hydrogen Hubs in October 2025. That is a meaningful enabling step because hydrogen export economics are not just about production cost; they are about storage, conversion into ammonia or other derivatives, port handling, offtake contracts, and certification that importing markets will actually accept. India’s April 2025 Green Hydrogen Certification Scheme is therefore more than paperwork. Without credible certification and logistics infrastructure, “export potential” remains a speech line. With them, India at least has the beginnings of a tradable product framework.

Even then, the export case should not be romanticised. IRENA’s 2025 trade analysis argues that global trade in green hydrogen and related commodities can strengthen industrial competitiveness, but it frames that opportunity around derivatives such as ammonia, e-methanol and direct reduced iron, not bulk shipments of pure hydrogen everywhere. That distinction matters. India is more likely to compete in export-linked ammonia, green fuels and embedded green industrial products than in some simplistic vision of shipping raw hydrogen around the world at scale. The countries that win this race won’t necessarily be those with the grandest missions. They’ll be the ones that can combine renewable resource quality, cheap capital, port efficiency, industrial buyers and trade-compliant certification into one bankable chain.

So, is green hydrogen hype, hope, or the next IT moment? It is partly hype when sold as a universal energy replacement. It is real hope when targeted at refining, ammonia, chemicals, shipping fuels and eventually green steel. And it is not the next IT moment if by that we mean an asset-light, talent-led export wave that creates mass middle-class employment quickly. Hydrogen is slower, heavier and more capital intensive. But that doesn’t make it less important. In fact, it may become important precisely because it sits at the junction of energy security, industrial policy and trade competitiveness. India doesn’t need green hydrogen to become software. It needs it to become steel, fertilizer, refining and exports with a lower carbon bill. If the country can keep squeezing electricity cost, build domestic electrolyser capability, and convert announced demand into real long-term offtake, then hydrogen may not be the next IT story. It may become something rarer: a strategic industrial story that actually compounds.

Green hydrogen India is being sold with the language of inevitability. The country wants cleaner industry, lower import dependence, stronger manufacturing depth and a fresh export story. But hydrogen is useful only where electricity cannot do the job cheaply enough on its own. The real issue is whether India can make it pay in sectors that already consume hydrogen or need high-temperature molecules, before the idea is inflated into a national myth. That narrower lens moves the discussion from slogan to strategy.

Green hydrogen India already has buyers

Unlike many clean-tech stories, this one does not begin with hypothetical demand. India already has industrial users. The fertiliser and petrochemical chains consume conventional grey hydrogen today, and the National Green Hydrogen Mission is built around replacing part of that demand with green hydrogen, green ammonia and green methanol (MNRE National Green Hydrogen Mission portal). By late 2025, projects had been awarded for 20,000 metric tonnes per annum of green hydrogen supply to the refineries of Indian Oil, Bharat Petroleum and Hindustan Petroleum, while SECI’s green ammonia tender covered 724,000 metric tonnes per annum for fertiliser-linked offtake (PIB, 29 December 2025; SECI NGHM page). Early hydrogen economics improve when the buyer already exists and the molecule already fits the process.

The state has moved from speeches to auctions

This is no longer a paper mission. The National Green Hydrogen Mission carries an outlay of Rs 19,744 crore through FY2030, with Rs 17,490 crore earmarked for the SIGHT incentive structure and additional support for pilots, R&D and hubs (PIB, 12 November 2025; MNRE mission page). More important than the headline outlay is the procurement trail beneath it. SECI’s awards now show 3,000 MW per year of electrolyser manufacturing capacity and 862,000 tonnes per annum of green hydrogen production capacity awarded across two rounds (SECI NGHM page; Budget implementation report, 1 February 2026). India is still far from its 2030 ambition of 5 million metric tonnes a year, but the policy stack has shifted from advocacy to market-making.

The cost curve is improving, but the math is still stubborn

Cost remains the central obstacle. In a Rajya Sabha reply published on 25 March 2026, the government said only around 8,000 tonnes per annum of green hydrogen production capacity had actually been commissioned in India by February 2026, despite far larger awarded volumes (PIB, 25 March 2026). The same reply reported discovered costs of Rs 397 per kg for Indian Oil and Rs 387 per kg for BPCL and HPCL, inclusive of GST. It also cited the World Bank’s estimate that renewable electricity contributes roughly 50% to 70% of total production cost, or about Rs 235 per kg. India has the beginnings of an input advantage – solar capacity reached 150.26 GW by 31 March 2026 and wind crossed 56 GW – but hydrogen needs not just cheap power, but cheap power with high utilisation, storage support and patient financing (PIB, 8 April 2026; MNRE year-wise achievements).

Where green hydrogen India actually makes economic sense

The most credible use-cases are the least romantic ones. Refineries and fertilisers come first because hydrogen is already embedded in their chemistry. Steel comes next because some pathways are harder to electrify cleanly. Shipping and long-haul heavy mobility remain promising, though still pilot-stage. That sequencing is visible in the programme design. MNRE has provided dedicated pilot outlays for steel, mobility and shipping, while by December 2025 five transport pilot projects had been sanctioned for 37 hydrogen-fuelled vehicles and nine refuelling stations across 10 routes; steel pilots had also been sanctioned; and port-based infrastructure had begun moving from concept to asset (MNRE mission page; PIB, 8 December 2025). The negative implication matters too: hydrogen is not the best answer for most cars, most buildings or every industrial heat process.

Why the export case is real, but not yet bankable at scale

India’s export ambition is not fantasy. Three ports – Deendayal, V.O. Chidambaranar and Paradip – have been recognised as green hydrogen hubs, and the certification regime launched in 2025 gives India a domestic standard for what can legally be called green hydrogen (PIB, 8 December 2025; Green Hydrogen Certification Scheme of India). Under that scheme, hydrogen must stay below 2 kgCO2eq per kg H2 across the defined system boundary (MNRE certification scheme, 2025). Still, export enthusiasm should be tempered by what global evidence now shows. The IEA said in Global Hydrogen Review 2025 that nearly 45% of announced low-emissions hydrogen production projects worldwide are intended for export, but only 5% of those export-oriented projects had reached final investment decision. The immediate constraint is bankable offtake.

This is heavier than software, and that changes everything

That is why the “next IT moment” comparison is catchy but wrong. India’s software rise scaled through talent, telecom connectivity and relatively asset-light replication. Hydrogen scales through electricity, electrolysers, water management, storage, pipelines, port handling, safety systems and long-duration contracts. One is a services export story with low marginal distribution cost. The other is a molecule business tied to industrial geography and cost of capital. Even the green ammonia auction results make that plain. SECI says discovered prices ranged from Rs 49.75 per kg to Rs 64.74 per kg in the 2025 tender and were low enough in some cases to suggest near-parity with grey ammonia in specific domestic applications (SECI NGHM page). That is encouraging. But it is not software economics.

What it means for the middle class, tax professionals and corporate India

The middle class is unlikely to buy a hydrogen future directly any time soon. It will feel the effects indirectly through import dependence, fertiliser economics, freight costs, industrial competitiveness and jobs in engineering-heavy supply chains. If green hydrogen cuts future fossil-fuel imports at scale, the macro dividend is real; official projections still point to import savings of more than Rs 1 lakh crore annually by 2030 if mission targets are met (PIB, 12 November 2025). For tax professionals and finance teams, the action sits in capital allocation and compliance friction: open-access power contracts, equipment procurement, GST treatment, carbon-credit eligibility, certification, and monitoring-reporting-verification systems that have to survive audit rather than marketing copy. For corporate India, the key question is whether the firm has the balance sheet, renewable tie-up, industrial use-case and offtake visibility to make the numbers work.

Hype, hope, or a strategic industry?

The cleanest answer is that green hydrogen India is all three, but in different doses. It is hype when presented as a universal fuel or an effortless export bonanza. It is hope when anchored to fertilisers, refining, steel and shipping, where molecules matter and decarbonisation is otherwise expensive. And it could become a major strategic industry if India converts renewable scale, manufacturing incentives, certification credibility and port geography into lower delivered costs over the next few years. The lesson from 2025 and 2026 is not that the hydrogen thesis has failed. It is that the thesis is narrowing into something more believable. Serious industries are built when a few use-cases start paying.

Sources & Data Points

  1. Ministry of New and Renewable Energy, National Green Hydrogen Mission portal – mission structure, demand creation, pilot outlays and enabling policy framework.
    https://mnre.gov.in/en/national-green-hydrogen-mission/
  2. Solar Energy Corporation of India (SECI), NGHM page – awarded electrolyser capacity, awarded hydrogen production capacity, and green ammonia auction results.
    https://seci.co.in/nghm
  3. Press Information Bureau, 12 November 2025, ‘Unlocking India’s Green Hydrogen Production Potential’ – mission outlay, 2030 projections, awarded capacities, hubs and certification context.
    https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2189126
  4. Government of India, Implementation of Budget Announcements 2025-26 – awarded 3,000 MW per annum domestic electrolyser manufacturing capacity and implementation status.
    https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/doc/impbud2025-26.pdf
  5. Press Information Bureau, 25 March 2026, ‘India Commissions 8,000 TPA Green Hydrogen Capacity till February 2026’ – commissioned capacity and discovered green hydrogen costs for refinery supply.
    https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2245157
  6. Press Information Bureau, 8 December 2025, ‘Government Driving National Green Hydrogen Mission Forward with Whole-of-Government Coordination’ – transport pilots, hydrogen hubs and shipping-linked infrastructure.
    https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2200444
  7. Green Hydrogen Certification Scheme of India, 2025 – emissions threshold, certification framework and MRV architecture.
    https://nghm.mnre.gov.in/admin/uploads/resources/174582349578999Green%20Hydrogen%20Certification%20Scheme%20of%20India.pdf
  8. Press Information Bureau, 8 April 2026, ‘India Ranks third globally in Renewable Energy Installed Capacity’ – solar capacity milestone as of 31 March 2026.
    https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2250039
  9. Ministry of New and Renewable Energy, Year-wise Achievements – cumulative renewable capacity, including wind and solar as of 31 March 2026.
    https://mnre.gov.in/en/year-wise-achievement/
  10. International Energy Agency, Global Hydrogen Review 2025 – Executive Summary.
    https://www.iea.org/reports/global-hydrogen-review-2025/executive-summary
  11. International Energy Agency, Global Hydrogen Review 2025 – Trade and Infrastructure chapter, especially global export-project and FID data.
    https://www.iea.org/reports/global-hydrogen-review-2025/trade-and-infrastructure
  12. World Bank Group, Electrolyzers for Hydrogen Production – cost structure and electrolyser economics referenced by the Government of India.
    https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/099022326123011297

TFD Economic Research Desk
TFD Economic Research Desk
TFD Economic Research Desk covers the latest economic trends and developments, delivering in-depth analysis and reporting to help readers navigate the economic landscape, both Indian and global, with clarity and insight.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Subscribe

Popular

More like this
Related

Tax certainty India: Board for Advance Rulings vs MAP vs APA – what corporates should choose now

India's tax-certainty architecture now rests on three very different routes. BAR offers domestic legal clarity, MAP delivers treaty relief, and APA has become the most institutionalised option for recurring transfer-pricing risk. The right choice depends on timelines, bilateral exposure and how much confidentiality a boardroom really needs.

Capital vs revenue in digital businesses: when old doctrines meet the cloud invoice

Capital vs revenue lines are fraying in India’s digital economy. SaaS subscriptions, cloud infrastructure, and data-driven intangibles create enduring benefits without durable assets, forcing doctrine to chase new facts

Tax opinion in 2026: what makes it defensible when scrutiny arrives

A tax opinion in 2026 survives less on elegant citation than on facts, disclosure and process. As scrutiny gets more data-rich, defensibility now begins long before the notice arrives.

AI-generated invoices: when scrutiny asks for provenance, not polish

AI-generated invoices may be legally recognisable in India, but scrutiny turns on something harder than neat drafting: provenance, system control, metadata, and whether the transaction trail still holds under challenge.